Stranded in Nepal

This needs to go public.

I will not sit here and watch this piece of fucking shit show up every night, ask someone who to vote for, and then leave and not come back until the next night.

That's literally all he fucking does. He does not socialize with anyone, and he does not compete in the challenges. He just shows up for the TC's and votes and that's it.

He's pretty much an inactive player, so he needs to be pulled from the game.

Operation swap Keith with Mad Dog.
Signed.

Mad Dog wrote:Operation swap Keith with Mad Dog.
Signed.

signed both!

It's not too late hosts. You guys know what you have to do to save this season from being shit. Pull the little fucker out of the game.

lol

Mad Dog wrote:Operation swap Keith with Mad Dog.
Signed.

How about Operation Swap Keith with Mad Dog, And Then Let Jenna Return Too?

Operation SKWMDATLJRT.

Jenna wrote:

Mad Dog wrote:Operation swap Keith with Mad Dog.
Signed.

How about Operation Swap Keith with Mad Dog, And Then Let Jenna Return Too?

Operation SKWMDATLJRT.

Signed

Signed

Caryn, where do you even see a Keith PM? I went back about 8 pages and I don't see any.

It's pretty gross they are voting out someone else over an inactive. Like really gross. But I think it is a bunch of first time players and they may not have an understanding of how disgusting that is?

I'm not sure if Stranded removes people for inactivity? There's nothing in the rules about it and I feel like in the few games I played or watched here Jeff left it up to the players to deal with it.

Anyway.... Signed. He shouldn't be there. And he most certainly shouldn't make jury. Does jury start after tonight? We'd be at 12 I think.

Chad wrote:Caryn, where do you even see a Keith PM? I went back about 8 pages and I don't see any.

It's pretty gross they are voting out someone else over an inactive. Like really gross. But I think it is a bunch of first time players and they may not have an understanding of how disgusting that is?

I'm not sure if Stranded removes people for inactivity? There's nothing in the rules about it and I feel like in the few games I played or watched here Jeff left it up to the players to deal with it.

I've played in an ORG before where our majority kept an inactive around specifically because it was a constant they could control whilst voting out actual threats left. Especially knowing he would eventually be removed anyway, so it would have been a waste of a vote, if that makes sense.

Although I *HATE* inactivity, I personally don't think you shouldn't just remove someone for inactivity unless there is a clear rule from the beginning defining inactivity and then laying out the possible ramifications (being pulled). That said, there should be a clear rule defining inactivity and a resulting boot or replacement of that player.

I feel legitimately gypped that Keith made it further in the game than me.
But he did become less and less active, I guess.