Interesting reading you all's perception of Tina.
Here's what I think. I actually do think she's controlled the season, but in the worst way possible. She has been the swing vote for every single council, and that's because she would always talk to the minority alliance and lead them to believe she was flipping with them and voting out one of her Madhesi people. Every single vote... And then she would actually just vote along with Madhesi. It's why we've had arguably the most boring game possible in the merger.
She would entertain everyone's strategies, pretend to go along with them, and then shut them all down adn make sure it was a pagonging. Why did she do this? I have no idea... Why did she want to be seen as a tease who actually didn't make any moves at all? your guess is as good as mine, but that's exactly what she did.
Think about this... we went into the merge 4 v 4 v 4 and it has been a pagonging... HOW. HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN!?
The answer is Tina.
She lead everyone to believe that she was actually flipping the game with them, only to lie and just vote them out, pissing them all off. Now normally, i would think that is brilliant gameplay, but here's the problem... No one has noticed that she did this, and because she didn't actually make any moves, she has nothing to show for it but cock teasing the jurors and pissing them off while remaining loyal to the Madhesi that were outplaying her.
If the goal was to ruin the season and simultaneously tank her own game, Brava lady, you did it!!!
